{"id":33246,"date":"2018-06-01T20:19:37","date_gmt":"2018-06-02T01:19:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=33246"},"modified":"2018-06-01T20:19:37","modified_gmt":"2018-06-02T01:19:37","slug":"nylj-debour-faces-increased-criticism-where-do-we-go-from-here","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=33246","title":{"rendered":"NYLJ: &#8216;DeBour&#8217; Faces Increased Criticism: Where Do We Go From Here?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>NYLJ: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.com\/newyorklawjournal\/2018\/06\/01\/debour-faces-increased-criticism-where-do-we-go-from-here\/\">&#8216;DeBour&#8217; Faces Increased Criticism: Where Do We Go From Here?<\/a> By Barry Kamins:<\/p>\n<p>In this article on Criminal Law and Procedure, Barry Kamins looks at criticism of &#8216;People v. DeBours,&#8217; the case establishing the level of intrusion allowed during police encounters with citizens.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>For the first time in its 42-year-old history, People v. DeBour (40 N.Y.2d 210) is facing divergent criticism from members on the New York Court of Appeals, as well as a report issued by a committee of prosecutors at the New York State Bar Association. In recent decisions, two jurists have questioned whether DeBour\u2019s framework sufficiently protects a citizen who chooses to remain silent during a police encounter, thus invoking the right to be left alone. Another jurist has opined that DeBour\u2019s \u201chyper stringent\u201d structure is too technical and undermines the goal of public safety.<\/p>\n<p>In DeBour, the New York Court of Appeals announced that New York courts must now assess the propriety of street encounters that do not rise to the level of a seizure for purposes of the Fourth Amendment. To this day, New York remains the only state to regulate such encounters in this fashion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NYLJ: &#8216;DeBour&#8217; Faces Increased Criticism: Where Do We Go From Here? By Barry Kamins: In this article on Criminal Law and Procedure, Barry Kamins looks at criticism of &#8216;People v. DeBours,&#8217; the case establishing the level of intrusion allowed during &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=33246\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,69],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33246","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-seizure"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33246","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=33246"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33246\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33247,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33246\/revisions\/33247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=33246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=33246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=33246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}