Defendant was on parole and allegedly shot at somebody. That justified a parole search of his residence. The fact he was in jail at the time didn\u2019t matter. United States v. Jaiman, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64797 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 18, 2018). [Caution: This is a plausible conclusion from the opinion, but it’s not perfectly clear; not that that doesn’t keep a court from finding it plausible authority in the future.]<\/p>\n
The district court erred in summarily dismissing plaintiff\u2019s complaint that officers stopped his car and searched his person without any justification at all. It plausibly stated a claim and discovery will have to proceed. Floyd v. City of Miami Beach<\/a>, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 9896 (11th Cir. Apr. 19, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant was on parole and allegedly shot at somebody. That justified a parole search of his residence. The fact he was in jail at the time didn\u2019t matter. United States v. Jaiman, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64797 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. … Continue reading