\u201cThe government proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Trooper Styles developed reasonable suspicion of additional criminal activity during the initial stop and before Roberts consented to Trooper Styles’s request to search the Jeep. The facts of this case are similar to those in Pack, 612 F.3d at 361-62, in which the Fifth Circuit held that reasonable suspicion sufficient to support a 35-minute investigatory stop was created by the defendant’s extreme nervousness, conflicting stories, and the fact that he was traveling along a drug trafficking corridor. Id.\u201d United States v. Danyell, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61029 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 11, 2018).<\/p>\n
Thirteen officers entered defendant\u2019s home with guns drawn, but after the safety sweep, their guns were holstered, and things were calmer. The court finds on the totality defendant\u2019s statement in familiar surroundings was noncustodial. Defendant was also told she was free to leave. United States v. Jones, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62265 (N.D. W.Va. Apr. 12, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cThe government proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Trooper Styles developed reasonable suspicion of additional criminal activity during the initial stop and before Roberts consented to Trooper Styles’s request to search the Jeep. The facts of this case … Continue reading