{"id":32478,"date":"2018-03-31T04:55:47","date_gmt":"2018-03-31T09:55:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=32478"},"modified":"2018-03-31T04:56:00","modified_gmt":"2018-03-31T09:56:00","slug":"tx5-pre-jardines-dog-sniff-was-apparently-valid-at-the-time-and-wouldnt-be-suppressed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=32478","title":{"rendered":"TX5: Pre-<em>Jardines<\/em> dog sniff was apparently valid at the time and wouldn&#8217;t be suppressed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s home was subjected to a dog sniff a year before Jardines. Relying on that, the trial court suppressed. Because enough Texas cases held similar searches were valid prior to Jardines, the court concludes that the exclusionary rule would not be served by suppressing here when there was good faith reliance on prior case law. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.search.txcourts.gov\/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=6760c73c-0f80-4c76-b822-78e27360feb8&#038;MediaID=9291ca1f-af7e-4a25-9b6a-8db167a95553&#038;coa=\" + this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt + @\"&#038;DT=Opinion\">State v. Davis<\/a>, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 2305 (Tex. App. \u2013 Dallas Mar. 29, 2018).<\/p>\n<p>COA on a 2255 is denied. Petitioner can\u2019t show that the outcome would be different quibbling over the district court\u2019s use of \u201ctipster\u201d where the district court already found probable cause from the CI\u2019s story. United States v. Manning, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 7916 (10th Cir. Mar. 29, 2018).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s home was subjected to a dog sniff a year before Jardines. Relying on that, the trial court suppressed. Because enough Texas cases held similar searches were valid prior to Jardines, the court concludes that the exclusionary rule would not &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=32478\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,27,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32478","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-curtilage","category-dog-sniff","category-good-faith-exception"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32478"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32478\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32480,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32478\/revisions\/32480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}