{"id":31989,"date":"2018-02-25T09:38:38","date_gmt":"2018-02-25T14:38:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=31989"},"modified":"2018-02-25T09:38:38","modified_gmt":"2018-02-25T14:38:38","slug":"de-exclusionary-rule-does-not-apply-in-probation-revocation-proceedings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=31989","title":{"rendered":"DE: Exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Deciding an issue of first impression in the state, the court concludes that the exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings. Surveying law from other states, some recognize a bad faith exception for probation searches, but this case doesn\u2019t involve that. <a href=\"https:\/\/courts.delaware.gov\/Opinions\/Download.aspx?id=269240\">State v. Walker<\/a>, 2018 Del. Super. LEXIS 85 (Feb. 23, 2018).<\/p>\n<p>The USMJ ordered a Franks hearing, and the government appeals to the USDJ raising numerous grounds. The appeal is denied, and the hearing will proceed. \u201cFinally, the government argues that holding a Franks hearing will jeopardize the officer&#8217;s career. The court does not rule on motions based on sympathy for the police or the defendant. Nor is there any reason to believe that the magistrate&#8217;s judge order will make Franks hearings routine in this district.\u201d United States v. Simmons, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28532 (E.D. Wis. Feb. 22, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Deciding an issue of first impression in the state, the court concludes that the exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings. Surveying law from other states, some recognize a bad faith exception for probation searches, but this case &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=31989\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,21,58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-franks-doctrine","category-probationparole-search"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31989"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31989\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31990,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31989\/revisions\/31990"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}