A \u201cGPS Affidavit [does not need] to include the \u2018use and aims’ of the location information\u201d to be valid. [No case even suggests that.] United States v. Shulaya, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209340 (S.D. N.Y. Dec. 20, 2017).<\/p>\n
Defendant consented to a search of his lawfully stopped car and motel room. The police went to the motel and found additional stolen property, and they followed up with a search warrant to seize what they found. It was valid on the totality. United States v. Fields, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207155 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 15, 2017).*<\/p>\n
Defendant hasn\u2019t shown a reasonable expectation of privacy in his recorded jail calls, and they won\u2019t be suppressed just because there was no subpoena or court order to produce them. United States v. Feaster, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207651 (W.D. N.Y. Nov. 6, 2017) (R&R).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A \u201cGPS Affidavit [does not need] to include the \u2018use and aims’ of the location information\u201d to be valid. [No case even suggests that.] United States v. Shulaya, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209340 (S.D. N.Y. Dec. 20, 2017). Defendant consented … Continue reading