{"id":30801,"date":"2017-12-19T09:16:41","date_gmt":"2017-12-19T14:16:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=30801"},"modified":"2017-12-19T09:20:36","modified_gmt":"2017-12-19T14:20:36","slug":"co-the-statutory-right-to-notice-of-right-to-refuse-a-consent-search-doesnt-apply-when-the-automobile-exception-applies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=30801","title":{"rendered":"CO: The statutory right to notice of right to refuse a consent search doesn&#8217;t apply when the automobile exception applies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Colorado requires notice of a right to refuse a consent search of a car. When there is probable cause and exigent circumstances, however, that\u2019s enough for the search without even considering consent. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courts.state.co.us\/userfiles\/file\/Court_Probation\/Supreme_Court\/Opinions\/2017\/17SA68.pdf\">People v. Ball<\/a>, 2017 CO 108, 2017 Colo. LEXIS 1091 (Dec. 18, 2017) (see Treatise \u00a7 12.28):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[*2]  Because the district court either misapprehended or misapplied the controlling legal standards governing investigatory stops, arrests, and custodial interrogations, and because the warrantless searches of the defendant&#8217;s car and purse were justified on the basis of probable cause and exigent circumstances, without regard for the voluntariness of her consent or compliance with the dictates of section 16-3-310, C.R.S. (2017), the statute governing consensual vehicle searches in this jurisdiction, the district court&#8217;s suppression order is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Colorado requires notice of a right to refuse a consent search of a car. When there is probable cause and exigent circumstances, however, that\u2019s enough for the search without even considering consent. People v. Ball, 2017 CO 108, 2017 Colo. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=30801\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automobile-exception","category-consent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30801"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30801\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30803,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30801\/revisions\/30803"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}