After defendant\u2019s arrest, the landlord evicted him and gathered up his stuff. The police got the paperwork from the apartment from the landlord, and some of it was incriminating. Because the police didn\u2019t instigate the landlord evicting him other than by the mere fact of arrest, the landlord was a private searcher. United States v. Doss, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190967 (D. N.M. Nov. 18, 2017).<\/p>\n
\u201cSpecifically, Louis’s slow, erratic turn, the odor of alcohol that was strong enough for Dole to smell immediately upon approaching Louis’s vehicle, the open bottle within Louis’s reach, and Louis’s confused demeanor were sufficient to provide Dole with a reasonable suspicion of intoxication.\u201d State v. Louis<\/a>, 2017-Ohio-8666, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 5097 (2d Dist. Nov. 22, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" After defendant\u2019s arrest, the landlord evicted him and gathered up his stuff. The police got the paperwork from the apartment from the landlord, and some of it was incriminating. Because the police didn\u2019t instigate the landlord evicting him other than … Continue reading