An arrest warrant for Tyler in defendant\u2019s home didn\u2019t justify entry here because officers didn\u2019t show any exception to the warrant requirement. \u201cThe government has provided no authority for the proposition that the arrest warrant for Tyler, Tyler’s status as a parolee, or the ‘plain view’ doctrine serves to justify a search of Bembery’s residence for evidence to be used against Bembery.\u201d The government didn’t address Steagald. United States v. Fisher-Bembery, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156957 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 26, 2017).<\/p>\n
Multiple sales of drugs from the defendant\u2019s premises described by the CI and corroboration of the CI\u2019s tale in substantial part by the police provided probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant. State v. Fayson<\/a>, 2017-Ohio-7793, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 4140 (3d Dist. Sept. 25, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" An arrest warrant for Tyler in defendant\u2019s home didn\u2019t justify entry here because officers didn\u2019t show any exception to the warrant requirement. \u201cThe government has provided no authority for the proposition that the arrest warrant for Tyler, Tyler’s status as … Continue reading