{"id":29406,"date":"2017-09-25T04:21:12","date_gmt":"2017-09-25T09:21:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=29406"},"modified":"2017-09-25T07:37:34","modified_gmt":"2017-09-25T12:37:34","slug":"sd-being-a-close-friend-and-regular-social-guest-of-the-homeowner-still-doesnt-give-standing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=29406","title":{"rendered":"SD: Being a close friend and regular social guest of the homeowner still doesn\u2019t give standing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Being a close friend and regular social guest of the homeowner still doesn\u2019t give standing; it just isn&#8217;t a strong enough connection to the premises. He cared for the homeowner\u2019s cat on occasion, but that wasn\u2019t explained. <a href=\"http:\/\/ujs.sd.gov\/uploads\/sc\/opinions\/27857.pdf\">State v. Gaters<\/a>, 2017 SD 60, 2017 S.D. LEXIS 112 (Sept. 20, 2017):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[*P18]  Here, Gaters presented no evidence of &#8220;ownership, possession and\/or control of&#8221; Jones&#8217;s home\u2014such as a key, a right to exclude others, a right to be present in Jones&#8217;s absence. See United States v. Gomez, 16 F.3d 254, 256 (8th Cir. 1994) (listing factors to consider); United States v. Davis, No. 4:14-CR-00348-01-BCW, 2015 WL 3616751 (W.D. Mo. June 9, 2015). He also presented no evidence to support his historical use of Jones&#8217;s home. Gaters simply relies on his long-standing friendship with Jones, that Jones invited Gaters into his home the day of the search, and that Jones cared for Gaters&#8217;s cat. This evidence does not &#8220;demonstrate a personal and reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched.&#8221; See Hess, 2004 S.D. 60, \u00b6 11, 680 N.W.2d at 320. Nor does this evidence establish that Gaters had &#8220;a sufficiently close connection to the relevant places or objects searched[.]&#8221; See Gomez, 16 F.3d at 256.<\/p>\n<p> [*P19]  From our review, the circumstances suggest a situation &#8220;closer to that of one simply permitted on the premises.&#8221; See Carter, 525 U.S. at 91, 119 S. Ct. at 474. Therefore, Gaters has not met his burden that he had a subjective expectation of privacy in Jones&#8217;s home that society would recognize as reasonable. Because Gaters did not establish a protectable interest in the property searched, the circuit court did not err when it denied Gaters&#8217;s motion to suppress. In light of our holding on this issue, we need not examine whether law enforcement&#8217;s use of the pole camera violated Gaters&#8217;s Fourth Amendment rights.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Being a close friend and regular social guest of the homeowner still doesn\u2019t give standing; it just isn&#8217;t a strong enough connection to the premises. He cared for the homeowner\u2019s cat on occasion, but that wasn\u2019t explained. State v. Gaters, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=29406\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-standing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=29406"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29406\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29416,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29406\/revisions\/29416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=29406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=29406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=29406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}