Defendants were charged with a series of ATM robberies, and the government sought historical CSLI to link the defendants together. This is third party information. The fact that information was sought for over a year in some of the defendants\u2019 cases isn\u2019t determinative of unreasonableness because the period of the crimes covers over two years. Plus, CSLI isn\u2019t as intrusive as GPS because it\u2019s approximate. United States v. Brown, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154374 (D. Neb. Aug. 23, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152864 (D. Neb. Sept. 20, 2017).<\/p>\n
Another Playpen warrant sustained. United States v. Scanlon, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151471 (D. Vt. April 26, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendants were charged with a series of ATM robberies, and the government sought historical CSLI to link the defendants together. This is third party information. The fact that information was sought for over a year in some of the defendants\u2019 … Continue reading