Defendant didn\u2019t have standing to complain that emails were produced by subpoena from a prior company he was involved with. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in them. United States v. Shkreli, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140150 (E.D. N.Y. May 16, 2017).<\/p>\n
After a traffic stop, defendant\u2019s DL came back as suspended indefinitely. The officer called for backup. When that officer arrived, a drug dog was used. The stop converted to arrest, and the use of the drug dog didn\u2019t extend the stop any. United States v. Castillo, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140102 (D. Idaho Aug. 29, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant didn\u2019t have standing to complain that emails were produced by subpoena from a prior company he was involved with. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in them. United States v. Shkreli, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140150 (E.D. N.Y. … Continue reading