{"id":28924,"date":"2017-09-11T17:11:16","date_gmt":"2017-09-11T22:11:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=28924"},"modified":"2017-09-17T13:41:24","modified_gmt":"2017-09-17T18:41:24","slug":"m-d-pa-even-if-carpenter-prevails-in-scotus-it-doesnt-matter-pre-carpenter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=28924","title":{"rendered":"M.D.Pa.: Even if Carpenter prevails in SCOTUS, it doesn&#8217;t matter pre-<em>Carpenter<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Even if Carpenter goes in favor of the privacy interest, it has no effect on CSLI searches that occurred before. A bench warrant that showed up for defendant\u2019s arrest justified a search incident of his person. There was also probable cause for a search of his vehicle. United States v. Coles, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145489 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 8, 2017).<\/p>\n<p>Defendant&#8217;s motion to suppress was properly denied: The traffic stop was valid since defendant&#8217;s fianc\u00e9e failed to use her turn signal, and even if the information an informant provided was unreliable, it would not warrant suppression of the evidence. Defendant&#8217;s continued detention was not unlawful under the totality of circumstances because the officer testified that he knew defendant, that he had received reliable information from a CI defendant had drugs in the vehicle, and that defendant&#8217;s demeanor continued to make him nervous. Defendant\u2019s fianc\u00e9e&#8217;s consent to the search of the vehicle was obtained prior to the completion of the traffic stop and was freely given. <a href=\"http:\/\/opinions.aoc.arkansas.gov\/WebLink8\/0\/doc\/364490\/Electronic.aspx\">Rainey v. State<\/a>, 2017 Ark. App. 427, 2017 Ark. App. LEXIS 461 (Sept. 6, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Even if Carpenter goes in favor of the privacy interest, it has no effect on CSLI searches that occurred before. A bench warrant that showed up for defendant\u2019s arrest justified a search incident of his person. There was also probable &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=28924\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28924","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28924","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=28924"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28924\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28925,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28924\/revisions\/28925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=28924"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=28924"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=28924"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}