The court finds the officer not credible that the defendant picked up a gun and put in his pocket and there was thus no reasonable suspicion for his detention. United States v. Cruz-Monta\u00f1ez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96079 (D. P.R. June 21, 2017).<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter the accident, Marland did not initially consent to having his blood drawn. However, after his arrival at the hospital and a conversation with his fianc\u00e9, he indeed did consent, according to the testimony of two witnesses who were in the room at the time. Therefore, we conclude that the trial court relied on competent and credible testimony in finding that Marland consented.\u201d State v. Marland<\/a>, 2017-Ohio-4353, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2419 (3d Dist. June 19, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The court finds the officer not credible that the defendant picked up a gun and put in his pocket and there was thus no reasonable suspicion for his detention. United States v. Cruz-Monta\u00f1ez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96079 (D. P.R. … Continue reading