The search warrant affidavit showed defendant\u2019s standing in two cell phones that were seized. The phones were referred to as belonging to defendant, and she claimed them when asked about them but disclaimed ownership in others. Finally, she proffered that there was indicia of ownership on the phones. United States v. Castro, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72518 (E.D. Mich. April 20, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72519 (E.D. Mich. May 1, 2017).<\/p>\n
Defendant sought to modify his search conditions and supervised release, and the motion is denied based on his history. United States v. Taylor, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72475 (N.D. N.Y. May 3, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72470 (N.D. N.Y. May 12, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The search warrant affidavit showed defendant\u2019s standing in two cell phones that were seized. The phones were referred to as belonging to defendant, and she claimed them when asked about them but disclaimed ownership in others. Finally, she proffered that … Continue reading