{"id":26990,"date":"2017-05-01T00:02:37","date_gmt":"2017-05-01T05:02:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26990"},"modified":"2017-05-01T07:55:02","modified_gmt":"2017-05-01T12:55:02","slug":"26990","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26990","title":{"rendered":"MD: Issue on appeal more nuanced and different that one presented to the trial court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s issue on appeal is more nuanced, yet not the same as the one argued before the trial court, so there is no authority to decide it. So, the court does for the sake of argument, and it finds nexus. It also begs to know (it\u2019s Moylan, after all) what SCOTUS meant in Leon by \u201cconclusory\u201d and \u201cbare bones.\u201d At any rate, this affidavit clearly is sufficient because it\u2019s 29 pages detailing a drug investigation involving 50 officers and 13 wires. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mdcourts.gov\/opinions\/cosa\/2017\/0533s16.pdf\">Joppy v. State<\/a>, 2017 Md. App. LEXIS 420 (April 27, 2017). [Note: This is a problem we&#8217;ve all faced. In the haste [of some] to make out a motion to suppress, we file the motion and conduct the hearing expecting the proof to be one way, and then it&#8217;s different, perhaps raising other Fourth Amendment issues. We have to litigate all them and get a resolution for appeal. Also, resist the temptation to argue something different and better than you left on the table at the suppression hearing. If it&#8217;s waived, you can at least take a long shot at plain error, if your state even recognizes it. Mine doesn&#8217;t.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s issue on appeal is more nuanced, yet not the same as the one argued before the trial court, so there is no authority to decide it. So, the court does for the sake of argument, and it finds nexus. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26990\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,96],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26990","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-good-faith-exception","category-standards-of-review"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26990","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=26990"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26990\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27011,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26990\/revisions\/27011"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=26990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=26990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=26990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}