{"id":26978,"date":"2017-04-30T07:26:44","date_gmt":"2017-04-30T12:26:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26978"},"modified":"2017-04-30T07:26:44","modified_gmt":"2017-04-30T12:26:44","slug":"w-d-n-y-despite-bad-sw-drafting-text-messages-are-records-in-a-cell-phone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26978","title":{"rendered":"W.D.N.Y.: Despite bad SW drafting, text messages are \u201crecords\u201d in a cell phone"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u201c[N]otwithstanding the warrant&#8217;s poor grammar and \u2018unwieldy\u2019 language,\u201d the court finds that text messages are included within the definition of \u201crecords\u201d in the defendant&#8217;s cell phone. United States v. Swinton, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62172 (W.D. N.Y. April 24, 2017):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230; Although text messages are not expressly referenced in that language, they plainly fall within the scope of &#8220;records&#8221; that are &#8220;contained in a cellular telephone.&#8221; Indeed, it would be unlikely that an examiner could ascertain whether a contact contained on a cellular telephone was associated with a person from whom cocaine is purchased and sold\u2014which plainly fell within the scope of the warrant\u2014without reviewing the substance of the communications involving the person, as reflected by a text message. Moreover, the identifying information contained within a text message (such as telephone numbers and\/or contact information) would fall within the scope of the warrant even if not specifically listed in the phone&#8217;s contact section, to the same extent as a telephone bill (specifically referenced in the warrant) reflecting itemized information concerning calls made and received. &#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201c[N]otwithstanding the warrant&#8217;s poor grammar and \u2018unwieldy\u2019 language,\u201d the court finds that text messages are included within the definition of \u201crecords\u201d in the defendant&#8217;s cell phone. United States v. Swinton, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62172 (W.D. N.Y. April 24, 2017):<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,59],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-particularity","category-scope-of-search"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=26978"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26978\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26979,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26978\/revisions\/26979"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=26978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=26978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=26978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}