Defendant had a release condition to stay away from children, but he babysat two and he let them use his cell phone connected to his computer. This was reasonable suspicion for a search of the cell phone and computer for evidence of child grooming. The phone itself had picture capability, and that too was a violation of release conditions. United States v. Howard, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63254 (D.Mont. March 21, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63066 (D.Mont. April 24, 2017).*<\/p>\n
Warrantless search of defendant was valid on the merits, so there can\u2019t be IAC. Lee v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63579 (D. Me. April 20, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant had a release condition to stay away from children, but he babysat two and he let them use his cell phone connected to his computer. This was reasonable suspicion for a search of the cell phone and computer for … Continue reading