{"id":26604,"date":"2017-04-04T07:13:32","date_gmt":"2017-04-04T12:13:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26604"},"modified":"2017-04-04T08:05:31","modified_gmt":"2017-04-04T13:05:31","slug":"tn-procedural-errors-in-handling-the-paperwork-of-a-sw-after-execution-are-overlooked-if-no-prejudice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26604","title":{"rendered":"TN: Procedural errors in handling the paperwork of a SW after execution are overlooked if no prejudice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Alleged mishandling of the paperwork on a search warrant for new DNA in a cold case hit could have resulted in a motion to suppress, but it\u2019s not obvious that it would be granted because procedural defects in the return are overlooked if there is no prejudice. \u201cOur case law suggests that procedural errors not included in Rule 41(g) do not result in suppression of the evidence.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsc.state.tn.us\/sites\/default\/files\/schaffer_harold_bernardopn.pdf\">Schaffer v. State<\/a>, 2017 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 240 (March 31, 2017) (see Treatise \u00a7 59.05 n.4).<\/p>\n<p>Defense counsel were not ineffective for not challenging the search of defendant\u2019s car because his wife consented to it, and he expressly did not want to involve his wife, and he likely abandoned it by running from the police after the stop. Ramirez v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47800 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 17, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Alleged mishandling of the paperwork on a search warrant for new DNA in a cold case hit could have resulted in a motion to suppress, but it\u2019s not obvious that it would be granted because procedural defects in the return &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26604\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26604","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ineffective-assistance","category-warrant-requirement"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26604","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=26604"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26604\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26606,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26604\/revisions\/26606"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=26604"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=26604"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=26604"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}