{"id":25893,"date":"2017-02-20T17:13:06","date_gmt":"2017-02-20T22:13:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=25893"},"modified":"2017-02-20T17:13:06","modified_gmt":"2017-02-20T22:13:06","slug":"ga-state-computer-privacy-statute-doesnt-protect-ip-information-from-third-party-disclosure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=25893","title":{"rendered":"GA: State computer privacy statute doesn&#8217;t protect IP information from third-party disclosure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A state computer privacy statute cannot be interpreted to protect IP information from administrative subpoena. The state courts have already held it isn\u2019t protected because it\u2019s third-party information. <a href=\"https:\/\/efast.gaappeals.us\/download?filingId=7662af6b-cc8a-4dd6-b56d-53345fccf902\">Courtney v. State<\/a>, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 56 (Feb. 17, 2017):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Here, however, Courtney contends that OCGA \u00a7 16-9-109 (b) grants him a reasonable expectation of privacy in the information listed therein, including his name and address, because it defines the circumstances under which an IP may be compelled to disclose that information to a law enforcement agency. This argument is without merit because, as explained below, OCGA \u00a7 16-9-109 (b) addresses the disclosure obligations of third-party IPs, not individual criminal defendants.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A state computer privacy statute cannot be interpreted to protect IP information from administrative subpoena. The state courts have already held it isn\u2019t protected because it\u2019s third-party information. Courtney v. State, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 56 (Feb. 17, 2017): Here, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=25893\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,79],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy","category-third-party-doctrine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25893"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25893\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25894,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25893\/revisions\/25894"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}