It should have been apparent to the officers that the defendant was a friend of the homeowner and was a guest in the premises, and their entry was unjustified under a claim of a burglary in progress or that a protective sweep was required. United States v. Brown, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15156 (M.D.La. Jan. 31, 2017).<\/p>\n
The stop of the car defendant was in was justified for speeding 50 in a 30. The government doesn\u2019t have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt reasonable suspicion. Defendant\u2019s furtive movements in the justified his frisk. United States v. Doherty, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10316 (E.D.Wis. Jan. 6, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10321 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 25, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
It should have been apparent to the officers that the defendant was a friend of the homeowner and was a guest in the premises, and their entry was unjustified under a claim of a burglary in progress or that a … Continue reading