The extended border search doctrine applied to a package shipped from China through customs at JFK and then to a warehouse in Bowie, Maryland. It was under lock and key, even on the truck, from customs to the warehouse where it was ultimately searched, and it was in the same condition with no chance anyone tampered with it. United States v. Larson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175547 (D.Md. Dec. 19, 2016).<\/p>\n
Plaintiffs\u2019 allegations of excessive force, along with video evidence, on an already subdued, nonresisting, and prone suspect in jail survived summary judgment. \u201cUnder these circumstances, a reasonable jury could conclude that some or all of those actions were objectively unreasonable. Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201 (2001).\u201d Moreover, the law was clearly established by a similar case in this circuit in 2003. Atencio v. Arpaio<\/a>, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 23426 (9th Cir. Dec. 30, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The extended border search doctrine applied to a package shipped from China through customs at JFK and then to a warehouse in Bowie, Maryland. It was under lock and key, even on the truck, from customs to the warehouse where … Continue reading