The officer\u2019s frisk of defendant\u2019s vehicle for a weapon was reasonable on reasonable suspicion even though defendant was out of the car. It wouldn’t be hard for him to get back to car. [Seems difficult to imagine a vehicle frisk with the driver still in it.] State v. Glenn, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 4495 (1st Dist. Nov. 4, 2016).<\/p>\n
The cell phone part of the search warrant was valid and did not merely \u201cparrot\u201d Rule 41. The Franks portion of the motion to suppress is denied. Even with the challenged information deleted, probable cause remained. United States v. Charles, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141484 (D.Minn. Oct. 12, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The officer\u2019s frisk of defendant\u2019s vehicle for a weapon was reasonable on reasonable suspicion even though defendant was out of the car. It wouldn’t be hard for him to get back to car. [Seems difficult to imagine a vehicle frisk … Continue reading