Defendant\u2019s coming out of a drug house was reasonable suspicion for a stop and frisk where it was known that drugs and guns had been seized there just a few months before. United States v. Williams, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144231 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2016).<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Court finds that all this activity was permitted as a welfare check. Deputy Brinson had arrived knowing only that there had been a man screaming and making death threats. This reasonably perceived emergency justified both Deputy Brinson’s questions to Defendant concerning other persons at the scene and her warrantless entrance into the residence to confirm the roommate’s safety, even assuming Defendant had not validly consented to the entry.\u201d United States v. Guillen, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144145 (D.Nev. Oct. 17, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s coming out of a drug house was reasonable suspicion for a stop and frisk where it was known that drugs and guns had been seized there just a few months before. United States v. Williams, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading