Defendant\u2019s stop was briefly extended for a drug dog, but about the only thing that remotely justifies it is the fact defendant\u2019s criminal history came back considerably worse than defendant admitted to the officer when first asked. United States v. Petrakis, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181193 (M.D.Fla. Dec. 14, 2015), adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125531 (M.D.Fla. Sept. 15, 2016).<\/p>\n
In a business records search directed at defendant\u2019s home, the fact business records would be there doesn\u2019t naturally follow, but here the government had trash pulls that confirmed some business records would be there. All things considered, it was reasonable to include computers in the search warrant for records. United States v. Traum, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123102 (S.D.Ohio Sept. 12, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s stop was briefly extended for a drug dog, but about the only thing that remotely justifies it is the fact defendant\u2019s criminal history came back considerably worse than defendant admitted to the officer when first asked. United States v. … Continue reading