Probable cause did not become stale as defendant drove from Philadelphia to Erie with drugs. United States v. Andino, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117097 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 31, 2016).<\/p>\n
\u201cThe fifteen minute period between Defendant’s initial stop and the contested canine search was not unreasonably long given Officer Graham’s early formation of reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.\u201d United States v. Bastardo-Villanueva, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115480 (M.D.La. Aug. 29, 2016).*<\/p>\n
Defendant consented to extending the stop until reasonable suspicion developed. United States v. Ramos, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114230 (D.N.M. July 11, 2016).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s speeding stop led to finding he had a suspended DL and that led to a valid inventory of his car when he was arrested. United States v. Conaway, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115779 (S.D.Ga. Aug. 29, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Probable cause did not become stale as defendant drove from Philadelphia to Erie with drugs. United States v. Andino, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117097 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 31, 2016). \u201cThe fifteen minute period between Defendant’s initial stop and the contested canine … Continue reading