The sheriff\u2019s office entered defendant\u2019s home to execute on a civil judgment for attorneys fees in a domestic matter obtained by a default judgment. Firearms were found, but he was a prohibited person. The civil process was a court order authorizing an entry under the Fourth Amendment [with virtually no discussion, but it is correct]. United States v. Bates, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113405 (W.D.Tenn. Aug. 24, 2016).<\/p>\n
\u201cHere, the superior court did not abuse its discretion; the unnecessary braking and the weaving out of the traffic lane constituted a sufficient objective basis on which the officer could conclude the driver might be impaired.\u201d Defendant also slowed below the speed limit when he passed the officer on the side of the road. State v. Gutierrez<\/a>, 2016 Ariz. App. LEXIS 213 (Sept. 1, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The sheriff\u2019s office entered defendant\u2019s home to execute on a civil judgment for attorneys fees in a domestic matter obtained by a default judgment. Firearms were found, but he was a prohibited person. The civil process was a court order … Continue reading