{"id":23495,"date":"2016-08-27T13:37:53","date_gmt":"2016-08-27T18:37:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=23495"},"modified":"2016-08-28T09:54:37","modified_gmt":"2016-08-28T14:54:37","slug":"il-officers-entry-was-consented-to-and-a-suspect-fled-with-officer-chasing-when-he-came-back-he-re-entered-and-it-was-treated-as-part-of-initial-entry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=23495","title":{"rendered":"IL: Officer&#8217;s entry was consented to and a suspect fled with officer chasing; when he came back he re-entered, and it was treated as part of initial entry"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There was a consensual entry into a room, and a suspect fled. The officer gave chase and returned. Under state case law, that was essentially one continuous entry, and the second re-entry didn\u2019t required a separate consent. Defendant, moreover, didn\u2019t object to the re-entry. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.illinoiscourts.gov\/Opinions\/AppellateCourt\/2016\/1stDistrict\/1140059.pdf\">People v. Franklin<\/a>, 2016 IL App (1st) 140049, 2016 Ill. App. LEXIS 568 (Aug. 24, 2016).<\/p>\n<p>A group of youths started a ruckus in an Indianapolis Macy\u2019s at 2 am on Black Friday 2015, one with a gun. It moved to the parking lot and the police had a description of the group. They saw them on the parking lot, and the stop was with reasonable suspicion. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.in.gov\/judiciary\/opinions\/pdf\/08241603lmb.pdf\">In Matter of J.J. v. State<\/a>, 2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 310 (Aug. 24, 2016).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s stop in a theater lobby when he was sitting alone was without reasonable suspicion, and the gun found on him had to be suppressed. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.in.gov\/judiciary\/opinions\/pdf\/08241602msm.pdf\">Pinner v. State<\/a>, 2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 312 (Aug. 24, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There was a consensual entry into a room, and a suspect fled. The officer gave chase and returned. Under state case law, that was essentially one continuous entry, and the second re-entry didn\u2019t required a separate consent. Defendant, moreover, didn\u2019t &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=23495\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23495","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-consent","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23495","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23495"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23495\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23504,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23495\/revisions\/23504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23495"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23495"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23495"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}