\u201c[T]he affidavit only needs to show a \u2018nexus\u2019 between the place to be searched and the evidence sought. [\u00b6] A common-sense reading of the affidavit leads to the conclusion that there is a nexus between the residence and the evidence of \u2018any illegal narcotics and drug paraphernalia.\u2019\u201d Two controlled buys provided that. United States v. Davison, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96553 (N.D.Ohio July 25, 2016).*<\/p>\n
Yet again, and for the upteenth time, the Court of Federal Claims holds that the Fourth Amendment is not a \u201cmoney mandating\u201d provision, and it thus lacks jurisdiction. Johnson v. United States<\/a>, 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1021 (July 26, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u201c[T]he affidavit only needs to show a \u2018nexus\u2019 between the place to be searched and the evidence sought. [\u00b6] A common-sense reading of the affidavit leads to the conclusion that there is a nexus between the residence and the evidence … Continue reading