There was a factual basis for the stop, so the pretext argument fails. United States v. Diaz-Cordova, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91591 (N.D.Ohio July 14, 2016).<\/p>\n
It appears that the U.S. Marshals had objectively reasonable belief that defendant was where they entered to arrest him on a warrant, so the case is remanded to the USMJ to rerun the hearing. United States v. Maclin, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88683 (W.D.N.Y. July 8, 2016),* rejecting, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91118 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2016).*<\/p>\n
At an immigration checkpoint, about 30 or 40 seconds elapsed before the driver consented to a search that led to the discovery of undocumented aliens hidden in the tractor. The search was lawful. United States v. McMillon<\/a>, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13240 (5th Cir. July 20, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" There was a factual basis for the stop, so the pretext argument fails. United States v. Diaz-Cordova, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91591 (N.D.Ohio July 14, 2016). It appears that the U.S. Marshals had objectively reasonable belief that defendant was where … Continue reading