\u201cAdditionally, the Sixth Circuit has held that it is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment for a police officer to ask a passenger for identification, even if there is no probable cause for a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing by the passengers. Thus, Kofhal had a right to obtain Defendant’s identification, even though he was a passenger. See e.g. United States v. Alexander, 467 F. App’x 355, 362 (6th Cir. 2012); United States v. Smith, 601 F.3d 530 (6th Cir.2010); United States v. Ellis, 497 F.3d 606, 613-14 (6th Cir.2007).\u201d Thus, defendant had to expect, having no DL on him, his name and one of his DOBs he gave would be run through the state database. United States v. Gibbs, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21431 (E.D.Mich. Feb. 23, 2016).<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s stop was continued past 20 minutes on probable cause to believe that defendant was involved in drug trafficking. United States v. Ramirez-Jimenez<\/a>, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11090 (4th Cir. June 20, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u201cAdditionally, the Sixth Circuit has held that it is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment for a police officer to ask a passenger for identification, even if there is no probable cause for a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing by … Continue reading