The video shows consent: \u201cThe recording clearly demonstrates that during the traffic stop, while both were standing by the front passenger door to the vehicle, the officer asked Jackson if he had a \u2018problem with me searching your vehicle?\u2019 to which Jackson immediately replied, \u2018None\u2019 and Jackson then opened the vehicle’s door.\u201d United States v. Jackson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72025 (E.D.La. June 2, 2016)*<\/p>\n
The district court\u2019s decision crediting defendant\u2019s grandparents\u2019 statements to the police at the time they entered the house over the suppression testimony has support in the record and is affirmed. They had full access to the room he claimed was his, so they had apparent authority to consent. United States v. Casey<\/a>, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10109 (1st Cir. June 3, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The video shows consent: \u201cThe recording clearly demonstrates that during the traffic stop, while both were standing by the front passenger door to the vehicle, the officer asked Jackson if he had a \u2018problem with me searching your vehicle?\u2019 to … Continue reading