When the defendant doesn\u2019t controvert the material facts in the government\u2019s response to his motion to suppress, a hearing isn\u2019t required because all the court has is to apply the law to the facts. United States v. Sledge, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68499 (S.D.Ala. May 25, 2016).<\/p>\n
Sufficient nexus was shown between the arrest of a child pornographer in the Netherlands and search of his computer along with his admissions that he had traveled to defendant\u2019s home about child pornography in Georgia and exchanged child porn. United States v. Nichols, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69230 (N.D.Ga. April 29, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
When the defendant doesn\u2019t controvert the material facts in the government\u2019s response to his motion to suppress, a hearing isn\u2019t required because all the court has is to apply the law to the facts. United States v. Sledge, 2016 U.S. … Continue reading