{"id":22320,"date":"2016-05-26T06:59:34","date_gmt":"2016-05-26T11:59:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=22320"},"modified":"2016-05-26T10:57:43","modified_gmt":"2016-05-26T15:57:43","slug":"ca9-911-call-about-two-black-male-teenages-involved-in-a-crime-didnt-give-pc-to-arrest-three-samoan-teenagers-immediately-recognizing-a-toy-gun-as-such-wasnt-rs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=22320","title":{"rendered":"CA9: 911 call about two black male teenagers involved in a crime didn&#8217;t give PC to arrest three Samoan teenagers; immediately recognizing a toy gun as such wasn&#8217;t RS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The court of appeals had jurisdiction to consider defendant officers&#8217; appeal from denial of qualified immunity on plaintiffs&#8217; Fourth Amendment unlawful arrest and search claims, but the court&#8217;s jurisdiction was limited to deciding whether the officers were entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law. After receiving information about an apartment manager&#8217;s 911 call regarding two black adult males, officers did not have probable cause to arrest three Samoan teenagers. The officers determined almost immediately that a suspected gun was a toy, and at that point any suspicion that the teenagers were engaged in a crime dissipated. The officers violated the Fourth Amendment by continuing the seizure beyond that point. The officers were not entitled to qualified immunity for their entry and search of a family&#8217;s apartment. <a href=\"http:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2016\/05\/24\/14-55387.pdf\">Sialoi v. City of San Diego<\/a>, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9489 (9th Cir. May 24, 2016).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The court of appeals had jurisdiction to consider defendant officers&#8217; appeal from denial of qualified immunity on plaintiffs&#8217; Fourth Amendment unlawful arrest and search claims, but the court&#8217;s jurisdiction was limited to deciding whether the officers were entitled to qualified &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=22320\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-probable-cause","category-qualified-immunity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=22320"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22320\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22339,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22320\/revisions\/22339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=22320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=22320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=22320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}