A typo in the address from including an address from a prior warrant at the end but where the correct address was at the time was hardly prejudicial. If the latter address had been searched, that would be really important, but defendant wasn\u2019t prejudiced here. United States v. Rivera, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64851 (W.D.N.Y. May 17, 2016).<\/p>\n
Officers lawfully entered the door of defendant\u2019s hotel room to arrest him because he didn\u2019t fully come out. A protective sweep was permissible because they factually had at least reasonable suspicion to believe that was another person inside. United States v. Cervino-Hernandez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65410 (D.Neb. April 28, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A typo in the address from including an address from a prior warrant at the end but where the correct address was at the time was hardly prejudicial. If the latter address had been searched, that would be really important, … Continue reading