Defendant abandoned the car he was in: \u201cafter being pursued by officers at high speeds for several city blocks, Crenshaw drove the green Cadillac across a vacant lot, crashed it against the side of a private residence, exited the vehicle, jumped over a small fence, and ran away from the vehicle.\u201d United States v. Crenshaw, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58802 (D.Minn. April 7, 2016), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57479 (D. Minn. Apr. 29, 2016).<\/p>\n
Border Patrol agents encountered defendant hiding in bushes near the border, and that was reasonable suspicion. When he admitted his immigration status, he wasn\u2019t yet in custody. United States v. Ramos-Zepeda, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57336 (D.Ariz. April 29, 2016).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s motion to suppress was based on pretext, but the stop was based on a traffic violation, so it was valid. United States v. Callahan, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (D.Mont. May 2, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant abandoned the car he was in: \u201cafter being pursued by officers at high speeds for several city blocks, Crenshaw drove the green Cadillac across a vacant lot, crashed it against the side of a private residence, exited the vehicle, … Continue reading