{"id":21840,"date":"2016-04-24T19:33:10","date_gmt":"2016-04-25T00:33:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=21840"},"modified":"2016-04-24T19:33:10","modified_gmt":"2016-04-25T00:33:10","slug":"m-d-ga-cis-tip-had-sufficient-detail-with-sufficient-corroboration-to-be-rs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=21840","title":{"rendered":"M.D.Ga.: CI&#8217;s tip had sufficient detail with sufficient corroboration to be RS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cAlthough Cartwright does not appear to challenge the CI&#8217;s basis of knowledge for the tip, it is a factor that is considered in the reliability analysis. &#8230; Even so, that fact, considered alongside the other substantial factors, leads to the conclusion that the information from the CI contained \u2018sufficient indicia of reliability\u2019 to justify a stop and that it was corroborated by other independent police work. &#8230; All in all, the CI&#8217;s tip alone satisfies the reasonable suspicion requirement.\u201d  United States v. Cartwright, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52513 (M.D.Ga. April 20, 2016).<\/p>\n<p>A nurse drew defendant\u2019s blood in the hospital, and the officer made a point of advising defendant of his rights when he was unconscious. There was excessive blood drawn, and the excess was taken without a warrant. The state can\u2019t claim the good faith exception without a warrant. <a href=\"https:\/\/appellate.nccourts.org\/opinions\/?c=2&#038;pdf=33928\">State v. Romano<\/a>, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 430 (April 19, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cAlthough Cartwright does not appear to challenge the CI&#8217;s basis of knowledge for the tip, it is a factor that is considered in the reliability analysis. &#8230; Even so, that fact, considered alongside the other substantial factors, leads to the &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=21840\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-good-faith-exception","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21840"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21840\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21841,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21840\/revisions\/21841"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}