\u201cIt generalizes that \u2018an individual\u2019 may have information on his or her phone that connects him or her to a crime, co-defendants or victims, rather than specifically connecting Ramirez, the crime with which he was charged, or any known information about communications made using this particular phone. [\u00b6] A criminal charge is a conclusion drawn by law enforcement based on information gathered that leads them to believe that a particular person is guilty of a particular crime. That cell phones contain evidence that may connect individuals to a crime is also a conclusion. An affidavit that contains only suspicions, beliefs or conclusions, without providing some underlying factual circumstances, has come to be known as a \u201cbare bones\u2019 affidavit.\u201d United States v. Ramirez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49012 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 4, 2016), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48719 (W.D.Ky. April 11, 2016).<\/p>\n
Probable cause for defendant\u2019s residence was shown by the fact his son was given money to get drugs and he went to defendant\u2019s home to get it. State v. Layman<\/a>, 2016-Ohio-1503. 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 1412 (4th Dist. March 31, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u201cIt generalizes that \u2018an individual\u2019 may have information on his or her phone that connects him or her to a crime, co-defendants or victims, rather than specifically connecting Ramirez, the crime with which he was charged, or any known information … Continue reading