\u201cThe court notes some of this information has never been protected, and this does not change simply because the phone records arise from use of a cell phone rather than a landline. See Smith, 442 U.S. at 745 (no reasonable expectation of privacy in the phone numbers dialed). [\u00b6] But basic telephone records and historical cell-site information are not ‘sensitive records’ that a person may keep on a cell phone or in a home. Cell-site information is not private information; it is information gathered and documented by a third party in the regular course of business. Accordingly, Defendant’s reliance on Riley is misplaced. See Guerrero, 768 F.3d at 359-60; Ledbetter, 2015 WL 7758930 at *14.\u201d United States v. Hudson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44967 (D.Neb. Feb. 19, 2016).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cThe court notes some of this information has never been protected, and this does not change simply because the phone records arise from use of a cell phone rather than a landline. See Smith, 442 U.S. at 745 (no reasonable … Continue reading