{"id":21573,"date":"2016-04-05T00:05:54","date_gmt":"2016-04-05T05:05:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=21573"},"modified":"2016-04-05T12:20:00","modified_gmt":"2016-04-05T17:20:00","slug":"md-dog-alert-on-a-car-for-marijuana-where-10g-or-less-is-a-civil-penalty-still-supports-probable-cause-for-a-search-of-the-car","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=21573","title":{"rendered":"MD: Dog alert on a car for marijuana where 10g or less is a civil penalty still supports probable cause for a search of the car"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dog alert on a car for marijuana where 10g or less is a civil penalty still supports probable cause for a search of the car. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mdcourts.gov\/opinions\/cosa\/2016\/1121s15.pdf\">Bowling v. State<\/a>, 2016 Md. App. LEXIS 37 (March 31, 2016).<\/p>\n<p>Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not challenging the search of the shed of another where he left evidence. First, he didn\u2019t have standing in the place; second, the owner consented; third, he effectively abandoned the stuff, leaving and apparently never coming back. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/10\/2016\/2016-Ohio-1404.pdf\">State v. Hawkins<\/a>, 2016-Ohio-1404, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 1277 (10th Dist. March 31, 2016).*<\/p>\n<p>The record shows defendant consented to a search. It came up when he was being questioned in a public place, and he wasn\u2019t coerced. United States v. Brown, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43540 (D.Neb. March 31, 2016).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s argument that the IP address was subject to speculation wasn\u2019t enough to overcome the totality of the showing of probable cause because it wasn&#8217;t that good an argument. United States v. Moberg, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44571 (W.D.Mo. March 15, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dog alert on a car for marijuana where 10g or less is a civil penalty still supports probable cause for a search of the car. Bowling v. State, 2016 Md. App. LEXIS 37 (March 31, 2016). Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=21573\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,27,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21573","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-consent","category-dog-sniff","category-probable-cause"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21573","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21573"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21573\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21579,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21573\/revisions\/21579"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21573"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21573"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21573"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}