The CI\u2019s seeing a gun in defendant\u2019s house a month before the warrant issued is not stale at all. \u201cThe Affidavit established a fair probability that firearms would be found.\u201d Also, the detail of the affidavit provided cross\u2013corroboration. Finally, defendant\u2019s Franks challenge fails. Even if he could show intent, he can\u2019t show that it was material to the finding of probable cause. United States v. Crowe, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35368 (E.D.Ky. March 4, 2016), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35024 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 18, 2016).<\/p>\n
Younger abstention barred a federal suit to enjoin a state administrative inspection and investigation. All American Check Cashing v. Corley, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37002 (S.D.Miss. March 22, 2016).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The CI\u2019s seeing a gun in defendant\u2019s house a month before the warrant issued is not stale at all. \u201cThe Affidavit established a fair probability that firearms would be found.\u201d Also, the detail of the affidavit provided cross\u2013corroboration. Finally, defendant\u2019s … Continue reading