In a search of a hotel room and arrest for sex trafficking of a minor, officers talked to the minor by telephone and that was sufficient to provide probable cause without much need for corroboration. Here, there was a tip and the corroboration was talking to the minor. United States v. Deffenbaugh, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34617 (E.D.Ark. March 17, 2016).<\/p>\n
In denying defendant\u2019s motion to withdraw his plea where he was going to get life in prison, defendant included a contention that a motion to suppress \u201cpossibly\u201d would be granted and that could have affected his decision to plead is not enough. Andaya v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35244 (W.D.N.C. March 18, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In a search of a hotel room and arrest for sex trafficking of a minor, officers talked to the minor by telephone and that was sufficient to provide probable cause without much need for corroboration. Here, there was a tip … Continue reading