Defendant\u2019s arrest was invalid, so the inventory of his car was invalid. Commonwealth v. Williams, 2016 Mass. Super. LEXIS 19 (Wooster Feb. 18, 2016).<\/p>\n
The protective sweep here was invalid, but that did not require suppression of the search. Excising the information learned from the protective sweep from the affidavit for the search warrant still left probable cause, and the search is valid. United States v. Haynie, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29323 (D.Neb. March 8, 2016).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s 2255 IAC claim on the search was an issue already decided in the direct appeal and couldn\u2019t be heard now. Wade v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30065 (N.D.Ga. Jan. 13, 2016),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29169 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 8, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s arrest was invalid, so the inventory of his car was invalid. Commonwealth v. Williams, 2016 Mass. Super. LEXIS 19 (Wooster Feb. 18, 2016). The protective sweep here was invalid, but that did not require suppression of the search. Excising … Continue reading