Defendant argued lack of probable cause for search warrants for two vehicles and a computer, so the court goes first to good faith and analyzes the probable cause through that lens finding that reliance on the warrants with this much detail was objectively reasonable. \u201cIt is clear to the Court that this is not a situation where the supporting affidavits were so devoid of factual support that it would be objectively unreasonable for a law enforcement officer to rely on it.\u201d United States v. Gonzalez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23073 (D.Minn. Jan. 19, 2016), adopted. 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23069 (D.Minn. Feb. 24, 2016).<\/p>\n
The fact that half of the center taillight didn\u2019t work was sufficient cause for a stop under California law. United States v. McKenry, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22691 (E.D.Cal. Feb. 23, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant argued lack of probable cause for search warrants for two vehicles and a computer, so the court goes first to good faith and analyzes the probable cause through that lens finding that reliance on the warrants with this much … Continue reading