2255 petitioner\u2019s IAC claim denied for generality and no factual basis: \u201cHere, the petitioner has failed to develop any factual basis or legal argument on the performance element, beyond the naked assertion that his attorneys did not advance any arguments in the motion to suppress or motion for reconsideration based on the \u2018fruit of the poisonous tree\u2019 doctrine.\u201d Utley v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9995 (E.D.Mich. Jan. 28, 2016).<\/p>\n
Pole camera surveillance of a house and defendant\u2019s comings and goings led to reasonable suspicion for continuing his stop. United States v. Ortiz-Macias, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10297 (E.D.Tex. Jan. 28, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
2255 petitioner\u2019s IAC claim denied for generality and no factual basis: \u201cHere, the petitioner has failed to develop any factual basis or legal argument on the performance element, beyond the naked assertion that his attorneys did not advance any arguments … Continue reading