The stop had a factual basis for a traffic offense even though the officer omitted from his report that the real reason was the DEA requested him to come up with a reason. \u201cThat the officer may have had ulterior motives in stopping Defendant has no bearing on the Court’s analysis here.\u201d After the stop, reasonable suspicion developed to continue it longer. United States v. Diaz, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174421 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2015), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2693 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2016).<\/p>\n
Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress the third party consent search because it would have been denied. State v. Scoles, 2016 Wisc. App. LEXIS 25 (Jan. 13, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The stop had a factual basis for a traffic offense even though the officer omitted from his report that the real reason was the DEA requested him to come up with a reason. \u201cThat the officer may have had ulterior … Continue reading