Defendant passenger had standing to challenge the stop and the length of detention, but not the search. Here, the stop was continued on reasonable suspicion. United States v. Garcia, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166581 (W.D.La. Sept. 23, 2015). [Note: But still, if the stop is overlong, the passenger could still win.]<\/p>\n
\u201c[W]e conclude that [defendant prison officials] are entitled to qualified immunity because a prisoner’s right to treatment of retrograde ejaculation, infertility, or erectile dysfunction is not clearly established.\u201d Michtavi v. Scism<\/a>, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21553 (3d Cir. Oct. 19, 2015) (ordered published December 11, 2015).*<\/p>\n Defendant had a full and fair opportunity to litigate her Fourth Amendment claim and did, so it can\u2019t be pursued in a \u00a7 2255. Johnson v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166243 (N.D.Ga. Nov. 3, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant passenger had standing to challenge the stop and the length of detention, but not the search. Here, the stop was continued on reasonable suspicion. United States v. Garcia, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166581 (W.D.La. Sept. 23, 2015). [Note: But … Continue reading