{"id":19701,"date":"2015-11-27T01:58:41","date_gmt":"2015-11-27T06:58:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=19701"},"modified":"2015-11-27T12:26:50","modified_gmt":"2015-11-27T17:26:50","slug":"n-d-iowa-when-no-one-answers-a-knock-and-talk-jardines-prohibits-shining-a-flashlight-in-the-window","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=19701","title":{"rendered":"N.D.Iowa: When no one answers a knock-and-talk, Jardines prohibits shining a flashlight in the window"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The legal authority to enter to do a knock-and-talk under Jardines does not permit the police to shine flashlights in the windows when nobody answers. In addition, the government\u2019s reliance on a Davis-type good faith exception for this conduct during a knock-and-talk doesn\u2019t fly because Jardines was decided before this happened and was already binding authority.  United States v. Alicea, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159496 (N.D.Iowa Nov. 24, 2015):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>While law enforcement officers may approach the front door of a residence in order to interview an occupant, they may not exceed the limits of an implied license when intruding on private property without a warrant. That is, Officers Garringer and Boesenberg were legally entitled to walk up the driveway, over on the sidewalk, and up to the front door. When no one responded to Garringer&#8217;s knock, however, there was no implied license to leave the path typically used to approach the front door, and search through windows of darkened rooms using a flashlight. Accordingly, I believe the observations made by the officers exceeded the scope of the implied license and were violative of the Fourth Amendment.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The legal authority to enter to do a knock-and-talk under Jardines does not permit the police to shine flashlights in the windows when nobody answers. In addition, the government\u2019s reliance on a Davis-type good faith exception for this conduct during &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=19701\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,70],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19701","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-curtilage","category-trespass"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19701","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19701"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19701\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19725,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19701\/revisions\/19725"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19701"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19701"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19701"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}