The search here was for a pain management clinic, and defendant was the officer manager, and her purse was searched under the warrant. \u201cAt the time of the search, agents were aware that Rosso was the office manager of the Pain Center and it was entirely reasonable for the agents to believe that the purse located on an office desk could easily contain items authorized for seizure under the search warrant, including prescription pads, prescriptions, and currency, to name a few.\u201d United States v. Rosso, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154435 (N.D.Ga. Sept. 3, 2015), adopted 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153609 (N.D.Ga. Nov. 12, 2015).<\/p>\n
\u201cThe State bears the burden of proving facts that establish a basis for continued detention. … [W]hether the State has met this burden is a question of law ….\u201d Here, there were no findings to support reasonable suspicion or not for extending the stop, so the case is vacated for findings. Reyes v. State<\/a>, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 674 (Nov. 16, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The search here was for a pain management clinic, and defendant was the officer manager, and her purse was searched under the warrant. \u201cAt the time of the search, agents were aware that Rosso was the office manager of the … Continue reading