Information that was 1-2 years old was included in the affidavit, and there was current information, too. The old information supported showing that defendant\u2019s counterfeiting operation was \u201cprotracted and continuous and that it was ongoing just two days to two weeks prior to the warrant application\u201d and, thus, not stale. United States v. Bagley, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131590 (W.D.Pa. September 29, 2015).<\/p>\n
The USMJ\u2019s credibility determinations are correct on probable cause, and defendant\u2019s arguments seeking to undermine the officers\u2019 credibility are unavailing. United States v. Barnes, 2015 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 133397 (N.D.Ga. September 30, 2015),* adopting 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133879 (N.D.Ga. August 18, 2015).*<\/p>\n
The driver of the vehicle was arrested on outstanding warrants and that justified an inventory. The officers actually nearly had, or at least were striving for, probable cause there were drugs in the car but couldn\u2019t corroborate the informants. State v. Johnson<\/a>, 2015-Ohio-4115, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3968 (2d Dist. September 30, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Information that was 1-2 years old was included in the affidavit, and there was current information, too. The old information supported showing that defendant\u2019s counterfeiting operation was \u201cprotracted and continuous and that it was ongoing just two days to two … Continue reading